Prop 65 notice 2018-00286: iKross, iKross.com, BlueMall, BlueBargain, Inc.

What happened after this notice

Reported to the Attorney General by the party that filed the notice, as of November 12, 2026. A settlement is not an admission and not a finding that anyone broke the law.

1. Settlement, July 17, 2018

   Defendant

   Bluebargain, inc.

   Case

   Hammond v Bluebargain

   Court

   Out of Court Settlement, None

   Total payments

   $21,500.00

   Civil penalty

   $1,000.00

   Attorney fees and costs

   $20,500.00

   Payment in lieu of penalty

   $0.00

   Terms

   3.1. BB shall not sell the Covered Product for distribution in California in the future and shall not resume sales of the Covered Product in California unless the product meets the reformulation standard set forth in Paragraph 3.2 or unless BB provides a clear and reasonable warning for any non-reformulated Covered Product that it ships, sells, or offers to ship or sell in California. 3.2. Except as provided above, upon the Effective Date, BB agrees to only manufacture for sale or purchase for sale in or into California, “Reformulated Covered Products.” For purposes of this Settlement Agreement, “Reformulated Covered Products” are Covered Products containing no more than 1,000 parts per million (0.1%) DEHP in any accessible component (i.e., any component that may be touched during use). In order to determine compliance with this reformulation standard, BB may rely on third party testing from an accredited laboratory.

   Official document

   PDF at oag.ca.gov