Prop 65 Notices

Prop 65 notice 2018-00407: NUTRAMARKS, LLC

Tamar Kaloustian filed this California Prop 65 60-day notice on March 20, 2018. It names NUTRAMARKS, LLC and alleges exposure to Lead from THOMPSON PSYLLIUM HUSK POWDER.

The violations below are alleged in a 60-day notice. They are not proven. A 60-day notice is not a lawsuit and not a finding of liability.

AG number
2018-00407
Date filed
Noticing party
Plaintiff attorney
Vache Thomassian, Esq.
Alleged violators
Chemicals
Source or product
THOMPSON PSYLLIUM HUSK POWDER
Official notice
Notice PDF at oag.ca.gov
Official record
Attorney General record for 2018-00407
Last checked
November 11, 2026

What happened after this notice

Reported to the Attorney General by the party that filed the notice, as of November 12, 2026. A settlement is not an admission and not a finding that anyone broke the law.

  1. Civil Complaint,

    Defendant
    NUTRAMARKS, INC.
    Case
    TAMAR KALOUSTIAN v. NUTRAMARKS, INC.
    Court
    Los Angeles County Superior Court, BC720382
    Relief sought
    Warning, Civil Penalty, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
    Official document
    PDF at oag.ca.gov

  2. Settlement,

    Defendant
    NUTRAMARKS, INC.,
    Case
    KALOUSTIAN v. NUTRAMARKS, INC.
    Court
    Los Angeles County Superior Court, BC720382
    Total payments
    $27,000.00
    Civil penalty
    $7,000.00
    Attorney fees and costs
    $20,000.00
    Payment in lieu of penalty
    $0.00
    Terms
    Commencing Ninety (90) days after the Effective Date, Defendant shall not ship, sell, or offer to sell in California a Covered Product(s) that is/are manufactured, distributed or sold by Defendant for which the serving size suggested on the label contains more than 0.5 micrograms of lead per day unless the label of the Covered Product contains a Proposition 65 compliant warning as set forth in Section 2.3. Ninety (90) days after the Effective Date in California, Covered Products manufactured, distributed or sold by Defendant shall either be (a) reformulated pursuant to Section 2.1 or (b) include a warning as provided in Section 2.3.
    Official document
    PDF at oag.ca.gov

  3. Judgment,

    This judgment was entered on a settlement. Its payment is the settlement's payment and not an added one.

    Defendant
    Nutramarks, Inc.
    Case
    Kaloustian v. Nutramarks, In.c
    Court
    Los Angeles County Superior Court, BC720382
    Total payments
    $27,000.00
    Civil penalty
    $7,000.00
    Attorney fees and costs
    $20,000.00
    Payment in lieu of penalty
    $0.00
    Terms
    Commencing Ninety (90) days after the Effective Date, Defendant shall not ship, sell, or offer to sell in California a Covered Product(s) that is/are manufactured, distributed or sold by Defendant for which the serving size suggested on the label contains more than 0.5 micrograms of lead per day unless the label of the Covered Product contains a Proposition 65 compliant warning as set forth in Section 2.3. Ninety (90) days after the Effective Date in California, Covered Products manufactured, distributed or sold by Defendant shall either be (a) reformulated pursuant to Section 2.1 or (b) include a warning as provided in Section 2.3.
    Official document
    PDF at oag.ca.gov

Get an alert when a notice names something you watch

We check once a day and email you when a new notice matches. You confirm by email first, and every email has an unsubscribe link.

What to watch (company, product keyword or chemical)

We store your email and watch list. See the privacy note.

Recent notices filed by Tamar Kaloustian