Prop 65 notice 2018-00892: Mizco International, Inc.

What happened after this notice

Reported to the Attorney General by the party that filed the notice, as of November 12, 2026. A settlement is not an admission and not a finding that anyone broke the law.

1. Settlement, August 30, 2018

   Defendant

   Mizco International, Inc.

   Case

   Hammond v Mizco International, Inc.

   Court

   Out of Court settlement, N/A

   Total payments

   $22,000.00

   Civil penalty

   $1,000.00

   Attorney fees and costs

   $21,000.00

   Payment in lieu of penalty

   $0.00

   Terms

   3.1. Effective on and after 120 days from the Effective Date Mizco shall not sell the Covered Product for distribution in California in the future and shall not resume sales of the Covered Product in California unless the product meets the reformulation standard set forth in Paragraph 3.2 or unless Mizco provides a clear and reasonable warning for any non-reformulated Covered Product that it sells in California. 3.2. Except as provided above, effective on and after the Effective Date, Mizco agrees to only sell in California, “Reformulated Covered Products.” For purposes of this Settlement Agreement, “Reformulated Covered Products” are Covered Products containing no more than 1,000 parts per million (0.1%) DEHP in any accessible component (“accessible component” is defined as any component that could be touched by a person during reasonably foreseeable use). In order to determine compliance with this reformulation standard, Mizco may rely on third party testing from an accredited laboratory.

   Official document

   PDF at oag.ca.gov